[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] LVM and resize2fs
On 06/10/10 20:19, Javier Guerra Giraldez wrote: No I can't be sure. That's what I was worried about. Do you think it's an issue? I guess I could not specify the size, however when I want to shrink a disk for a customer, then this becomes a bit trickier, as I have to resize2fs first and then lvresize. What would I do in this case?On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Jonathan Tripathy<jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I was getting worried that by specifying 25G in both e2fsck and resize2fs that may have caused problems..it is somewhat safer not to specify the size to resize2fs and let it simply use the device's size. otherwise, you expose yourself to slighly different interpretations of '25G'. not too likely, but can you be sure that 24.78G is exactly the same number of bytes to LVM and resize2fs? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |