Great response – thank you.
From:
xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 12:35 PM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Hardware performance question : Disk RPM speed
& XenPerformance
Each 7200RPM drive is good for about 100 IOPS. Each 15k RPM
SAS can usually handle 200 IOPS. I would not personally try to run 20-30
VMs from two SATA drives, because it would almost surely lead to poor
performance. But I am basing that statement on the type of IO I typically
see in our environment. Your VMs might use totally different amounts of
disk IO than my VMs do, so you may or may need not to worry about disk
IO. It really depends on the type of tasks each VM is doing. One
idea would be to measure the IOPS and graph it using MRTG. Start with a
few VMs and measure them for a few weeks to get an idea how much total disk IO
is needed prior to moving all of the VMs into production. Once you
actually measure the disk IO for a while, then you can make an informed
decision.
-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kevin
Sent: Monday, September 13, 2010 10:45 AM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] Hardware performance question : Disk RPM speed
& XenPerformance
Hello,
I am a relatively new user of Xen
virtualization, so you’ll have to forgive the simplistic nature of my question.
I have a Dell R410 poweredge server
(dual quad core CPUs + 32gb ram). I plan on utilizing this server with Xen.
The ‘dilemma’ I am having is
whether or not to replace the 2x 500gb 7.2K RPM drives that came with the
server with faster 300gb 15K RPM drives. Obviously drives that spin faster in
general are a better thing. I am trying to avoid investing $1,000 more in
obtaining these drives unless I feel it is absolutely necessary.
From Xen documentation, I couldn’t
get enough of an idea of how disk write and the speed of disks might play in a
potential bottleneck scenario when 20-30 VMs are ultimately going to be running
on the box.
Does anyone have any experience or
advise to share? Ultimately I don’t mind spending the extra money to replace
the drives but I would love to hear what your thoughts might be as far as what
kind of actual performance increases I might expect.
Thanks!
Kevin
