[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for Citrix	WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers
 
- To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx>
 
- From: Giovanni Bellac <giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx>
 
- Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 10:24:54 +0000 (GMT)
 
- Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 
- Delivery-date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 03:26:40 -0700
 
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=ymail.com;	h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;	b=AiHB1qMRvVgMZXawuaVOUKRxjqzDL0yPdV0BYCciFVe4p8PKBJtEZQ0Y787F+el9wG7IPoUrGrxEnCMvfT4f64Ujhf1FAZGL0bH5+kdbbArmokeLQSD941FcRuZGjilGsXIoH31kydP8B1fFSCS6ByDS71oGZ42XB3wvTHK3jBM=;
 
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
 
 
 
Hello Paul
  I am using "normal" opensource XEN 4.0.1, not XCP.
  I am creating the VM manually, lvcreate, manually creating .sxp and than xm create windows.xp
  Best regards Gio
   Von: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> An: Giovanni Bellac <giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx> CC: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
 <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gesendet: Dienstag, den 7. September 2010, 10:13:51 Uhr Betreff: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers 
 
 
Gio,  
    
  What tools are you using to create your VM? Iâm guessing
xm/xend. What happens if you use xl?  
    
  Paul  
    
From: Giovanni Bellac
[mailto:giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx]  
Sent: 07 September 2010 08:53 
To: Paul Durrant 
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers  
 
 
    
Hello 
 
> Since these is actually no fe driver for vfb, I suggest you just make sure
this node does not exist. 
 
sorry, but I do not understand that 100% 
I have one domU with one LVM partition created. There is no other domU or LVM
partition on this system. 
 
Best regards 
Gio  
 
    
 
 
Von: Paul Durrant
<Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> 
An: Pasi KÃrkkÃinen <pasik@xxxxxx>; Giovanni Bellac
<giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx> 
CC: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Gesendet: Montag, den 6. September 2010, 17:45:57 Uhr 
Betreff: RE: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers 
 
The problem is that your tools are creating a /local/domain/vfb/0 node in
xenstore. The PV drivers try to gracefully close down the backend for this
using the same fe closing -> be closing -> fe closed -> be closed
state dance that it uses for vifs and this is not working. 
Since these is actually no fe driver for vfb, I suggest you just make sure this
node does not exist. 
 
  Paul 
 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-devel- 
> bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Pasi KÃrkkÃinen 
> Sent: 06 September 2010 16:31 
> To: Giovanni Bellac 
> Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for 
> Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers 
>  
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 03:23:31PM +0000, Giovanni Bellac wrote: 
> >    Hello 
> > 
> >    I have done some new tests: 
> > 
> >    - XEN 4.0.1 (self compiled, "make world") +
2.6.32.21 from 
> Jeremy 
> >    - Windows 2008 R2 64Bit 
> >    with windows PV drivers from XCP 0.5 and the regedit
change 
> from here: 
> >    [1]http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg?rev/be9b8be3c648 
> > 
> >    Same error: 
> >    ... 
> >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in 
> >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange: 
> /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state 
> >    INITIALISING; retry. 
> >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in 
> >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange: 
> /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state 
> >    INITIALISING; retry. 
> >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in 
> >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange: 
> /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state 
> >    INITIALISING; retry. 
> >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in 
> >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange: 
> /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state 
> >    INITIALISING; retry. 
> >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in 
> >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange: 
> /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state 
> >    INITIALISING; retry. 
> >    XENUTIL: WARNING: CloseFrontend: timed out in 
> >    XenbusWaitForBackendStateChange: 
> /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/9/0 in state 
> >    INITIALISING; retry. 
> >    ... 
> > 
> >    I can not download XCP 0.1.1 to test the windows PV
drivers 
> from it, 
> >    because it is not downloadable anymore. 
> >    But I have read here in the lists, that the XCP 0.1.1
drivers 
> are not 
> >    fully signed. 
> > 
> >    So the feature 
> > 
> >    "Support for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV
drivers, included 
> in XCP 
> >    (Xen Cloud Platform). Xen Cloud Platform: 
> >    [2]http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html" 
> > 
> >    is not really working... :( 
> > 
>  
> Added xen-devel to CC list.. maybe someone from Citrix 
> has an idea why it doesn't work. 
>  
> -- Pasi 
>  
>  
>  
> >    Best regards 
> >    Gio 
> > 
> >   
--------------------------------------------------------------- 
> ----------- 
> > 
> >    Von: Pasi KÃrkkÃinen <pasik@xxxxxx> 
> >    An: Keith Coleman <list.keith@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
> >    CC: Dave Scott <Dave.Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; benco 
> <benco@xxxxxxx>; Xen List 
> >    <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
Mark Adams <mark@campbell- 
> lange.net> 
> >    Gesendet: Freitag, den 3. September 2010, 9:26:17 Uhr 
> >    Betreff: Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
Citrix WHQL- 
> certified 
> >    Windows PV drivers 
> >    On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:14:53PM -0400, Keith Coleman
wrote: 
> >    > On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Pasi KÃrkkÃinen 
> <[3]pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: 
> >    > > On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:21:02PM +0100, Mark
Adams wrote: 
> >    > >> Xen 4.0.1 rc3, didn't change any registry
settings. Can 
> you confirm 
> >    what 
> >    > >> needs to be changed or send a link? 
> >    > >> 
> >    > > 
> >    > > It's mentioned in the xen-4.0 hg changelog: 
> >    > > [4]http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0- 
> testing.hg?rev/be9b8be3c648 
> >    > > 
> >    > 
> >    > The signed windows drivers from XCP 0.5 are not ready
for 
> normal xen. 
> >    > Use the windows drivers from XCP 0.1.1, instead. 
> >    > 
> > 
> >    Are there some additional changes required to Xen 4.0 to 
> support XCP 0.5 
> >    winpv drivers? 
> > 
> >    -- Pasi 
> > 
> >    _______________________________________________ 
> >    Xen-users mailing list 
> >    [5]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >    [6]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
> > 
> > References 
> > 
> >    Visible links 
> >    1. http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg?rev/be9b8be3c648 
> >    2. http://www.xen.org/products/cloudxen.html 
> >    3. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx 
> >    4. http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-4.0-testing.hg?rev/be9b8be3c648 
> >    5. mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> >    6. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
>  
> _______________________________________________ 
> Xen-devel mailing list 
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel  
 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 
    
     |