[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] VT-x not found..
On Monday 31 May 2010 21:59:24 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > Jonathan Tripathy > I.T. Solutions Manager > ABPNI Computer Solutions Ltd. > Registered Address: > Emerson House, Belfast, BT8 8DN > Tel: +44 (0)800 11 234 28 > Web: www.abpni.com > Registered in N. Ireland No. 602753 > > This email and any attachments to it may be confidential > and are intended solely for the use of the individual to > whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are > solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent > those of ABPNI Computer Solutions Ltd. If you are not the > intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any > action based upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. > Please contact the sender if you believe you have received > this email in error. > > On 31/05/10 20:45, Bart Coninckx wrote: > > On Monday 31 May 2010 21:42:20 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > >> On 31/05/10 20:42, Bart Coninckx wrote: > >>> On Monday 31 May 2010 20:24:15 Jonathan Tripathy wrote: > >>>> On 31/05/10 19:11, Rudi Ahlers wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Jonathan Tripathy<jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>> <mailto:jonnyt@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Everyone, > >>>>> > >>>>> I upgraded my CentOS 5.5 to Xen 3.4.2 using this guide: > >>>>> > >>>>> http://www.syntaxtechnology.com/2010/01/upgrade-xen-3-0-on-centos-5-4 > >>>>>-x 86 _64-to-xen-3-4-2/ > >>>>> > >>>>> Now, using the new kernel that it gave me, the system doesn't > >>>>> seem to be able to detect vt-x.. > >>>>> > >>>>> In virt-manager, Local Install Media and Network Boot are > >>>>> greyed out.. > >>>>> > >>>>> Any ideas? > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks > >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ > >>>>> Xen-users mailing list > >>>>> > >>>>> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Doe your CPU acrtually support vt-x? > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Website: http://www.SoftDux.com > >>>>> Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com > >>>>> Office: 087 805 9573 > >>>>> Cell: 082 554 7532 > >>>> > >>>> Yes it does. It worked fine with the orignal version of Xen that came > >>>> with CentOS 5.5. It's a brand new server opened today from Dell which > >>>> support Vt-x and Vt-d. Virtualisation technology is enabled in the > >>>> BIOS > >>> > >>> You have the vmx flag in /proc/cpuinfo? > >>> I suppose you had the VT extension enabled before the migration but > >>> suppose you fiddled with it, power down your host (like shutdown and > >>> pull the plug) and power it up again. I experienced this being > >>> necessary once because simple rebooting after getting out of the BIOS > >>> did NOT enable VT for real. > >>> > >>> B. > >> > >> Nope, I don't have that flag in cpuinfo, but I can't understand why.... > >> Is it possible that the kernel upgrade can disable this somehow?? > >> > >> It's really confusing me > > > > I personally think not. Do the power recycle thing and check again. If > > you're sure it's on in the BIOS. Ow yes, which reminds me, I once had a > > BIOS where it needed to be enabled on two different spots - I think it > > was a HP machine. > > Power cycling made no different. I had the plug out for about 2 or 3 > minutes. > > This is really starting to worry me why the vmx flag isn't showing... > > I never checked for the vmx flag in the vanilla install, but since I was > able to create an HVM guest, I image it would have been there? > I can't imagine this is a result of the kernel being used. Whatever is in /proc/cpuinfo is what Linux reads out of the BIOS. Something is wrong there. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |