[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Raid1 performance
On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 12:40:39PM +0200, blub@xxxxxxxx wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 09, 2010 at 11:05:40AM +0200, blub@xxxxxxxx wrote: > >> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 08:23:19PM +0200, blub@xxxxxxxx wrote: > >> >> > On Thu, Apr 08, 2010 at 07:00:11PM +0200, blub@xxxxxxxx wrote: > >> >> >> hello > >> >> >> i've been trying to achieve reasonable disk i/o performance on > >> xen. > >> >> >> on debian 5.0.4 (xen 3.2.1, kernel 2.6.26) the pv/hvm performance > >> is > >> >> >> alright with a raid1 inside the domU. unfortunately the qemu > >> version > >> >> >> (0.9.0) does not cover my needs. > >> >> >> > >> >> >> so i've been trying xen 3.4.2 & 4.0.0rc8 on gentoo (2.6.31) > >> >> >> on both versions, the disk i/o performance drops to zero when > >> copying > >> >> >> large files. initially the performance is ok (~30mbyte/s) but > >> drops > >> >> to > >> >> >> zero after ~300mb, i've tried it with wget/ftp/scp > >> >> >> this happens with both PV & HVM domU's. i've tried multiple nic > >> >> drivers > >> >> >> > >> >> >> the performance seems alright if no raid1 is running on the domU > >> >> >> i cannot run the domU raid1's on the dom0 since there are multiple > >> >> dom0s > >> >> >> connecting to multiple FC SAN's and the raid1's are done across > >> the > >> >> >> SAN's > >> >> >> > >> >> >> (btw, the performance with raid1's on the SAN's is excellent on > >> dom0) > >> >> >> > >> >> >> anyone else has experienced this issue? > >> >> >> > >> >> > > >> >> > Did you make sure dom0 has more weight than the domUs, so that it > >> is > >> >> able > >> >> > to process the IO requests? > >> >> > > >> >> > See: http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenBestPractices > >> >> > > >> >> > -- Pasi > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> yes, the box has 8 physical cores, and the domU test installation > >> only > >> >> uses two of them > >> >> > >> > > >> > How many cores does dom0 have? > >> > Did you set up the xen credit scheduler weights? > >> > Did you pin the vcpus to specific cores? > >> > > >> > What does "iostat 1" show in dom0 while you run the test? > >> > What does "xm top" show in dom0 while you run test? > >> > > >> > -- Pasi > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> here is the output: http://pastebin.com/c3JqU7e4 > >> > >> everything looks normal in my opinion > >> > > > > Dom0 should have more weight than the domU! > > > > Was that dstat from domU or from dom0? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Xen-users mailing list > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > > > dom0 hast weight 1024, domU 512 > > here is iostat within domU: > http://pastebin.com/0mHy8Fm1 > Ok, so the iowait is huge in the domU. The question is why? Is there iowait in dom0, if you run "iostat 1" there? -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |