[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] PCI Passthrough without VT-d
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 02:01:28PM -0300, Sergio Charpinel Jr. wrote: > Hi, > I created a PV guest, and did a passthrough on my PCI USB Controller, to > use the webcam. > But, I'm receiving a kernel panic message on my domU afte boot. > I'm using CentOS 5.4 and Xen 3.4.2 > Password: Fatal DMA error! Please use 'swiotlb=force' Did you try that 'swiotlb=force' option for the guest kernel? Also, does the same problem happen if you run the official EL5 Xen (3.1.2) instead of 3.4.2 ? -- Pasi > ----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] --------- > Kernel BUG at arch/x86_64/kernel/../../i386/kernel/pci-dma-xen.c:394 > invalid opcode: 0000 [1] SMPà > last sysfs file: > > /devices/xen/pci-0/pci0000:00/0000:00:00.3/usb1/1-1/1-1:1.0/usbdev1.2_ep82/dev > CPU 0à > Modules linked in: autofs4 hidp rfcomm l2cap bluetooth lockd sunrpc > ip_conntrack_netbios_ns ipt_MASQUERADE xt_mark iptable_nat ip_nat xt_MARK > iptable_mangle ipt_REJECT xt_state ip_conntrack nfnetlink iptable_filter > ip_tables ip6t_REJECT xt_tcpudp ip6table_filter ip6_tables x_tables ipv6 > xfrm_nalgo crypto_api dm_mirror dm_multipath scsi_dh scsi_mod parport_pc > lp parport stv680 compat_ioctl32 videodev v4l1_compat pcspkr v4l2_common > xennet dm_raid45 dm_message dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod dm_mem_cache > xenblk ext3 jbd uhci_hcd ohci_hcd ehci_hcd > Pid: 1752, comm: zmc Not tainted 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5xen #1 > RIP: e030:[<ffffffff8027217b>] à [<ffffffff8027217b>] > dma_map_single+0x12d/0x17d > RSP: e02b:ffff88000cfb1c78 à EFLAGS: 00010282 > RAX: 000000000000002f RBX: ffff88000e860000 RCX: ffffffff804f3ba8 > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 > RBP: 0000000035032000 R08: ffffffff804f3ba8 R09: 0000000000000000 > R10: 000000000000002d R11: ffff88001f4230c0 R12: 0000000000019610 > R13: ffff88001fdef870 R14: ffff88001fb5f980 R15: ffff880010296ad4 > FS: à 00002b8745423c10(0000) GS:ffffffff805ca000(0000) > knlGS:0000000000000000 > CS: à e033 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 > Process zmc (pid: 1752, threadinfo ffff88000cfb0000, task > ffff88000f4530c0) > Stack: à ffff88000f4530c0 à ffff880010296ac0 à 00000000ffffffff > à ffff880010296ac0à > à ffff88001ff7d400 à ffffffff803e4200 à 0000000000000000 > à 000000d0802572b0à > à fffffffffff7ffff à ffffffff802c2e18à > Call Trace: > à [<ffffffff803e4200>] hcd_submit_urb+0x693/0x748 > à [<ffffffff802c2e18>] mod_zone_page_state+0x27/0x3d > à [<ffffffff8020b242>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x62/0x6d > à [<ffffffff8025e6e3>] cache_alloc_refill+0x13c/0x4e5 > à [<ffffffff802cfc34>] __kmalloc+0x8f/0x9f > à [<ffffffff881377e0>] :stv680:stv680_start_stream+0x18b/0x1c5 > à [<ffffffff881397a0>] :stv680:stv680_do_ioctl+0x4e1/0x57b > à [<ffffffff8811ddda>] :videodev:video_usercopy+0x1a1/0x265 > à [<ffffffff881392bf>] :stv680:stv680_do_ioctl+0x0/0x57b > à [<ffffffff8031a360>] inode_has_perm+0x56/0x63 > à [<ffffffff80222789>] __up_read+0x19/0x7f > à [<ffffffff802676cd>] do_page_fault+0xfae/0x12e0 > à [<ffffffff8026ef47>] monotonic_clock+0x35/0x7b > à [<ffffffff80243f5c>] do_ioctl+0x55/0x6b > à [<ffffffff802316b5>] vfs_ioctl+0x457/0x4b9 > à [<ffffffff8024e68e>] sys_ioctl+0x59/0x78 > à [<ffffffff802602f9>] tracesys+0xab/0xb6 > Code: 0f 0b 68 3a 2b 49 80 c2 8a 01 4d 85 ed 74 11 49 8b 85 18 02à > RIP à [<ffffffff8027217b>] dma_map_single+0x12d/0x17d > à RSP <ffff88000cfb1c78> > à <0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception > 2010/3/2 Jan Ã*eÃÂÃ*ut <[1]Jan.Cescut@xxxxxx> > > Thanks for thorough explanation. > > Have a nice day, > Jan > -----Original Message----- > From: Pasi KÃârkkÃâinen [mailto:[2]pasik@xxxxxx] > Sent: 27. februar 2010 14:04 > To: Jan Ã*eÃÂÃ*ut > Cc: [3]xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] PCI Passthrough without VT-d > > On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:29:22PM +0100, Jan ?eÃÂ?ut wrote: > > à à As I read XEN supports assigning a pci device to an unprivileged > domain > > à à without hardware supporting it. Has anyone already tried it? Are > there any > > à à security risks? If I understand correctly how PCI passthrough > works the > > à à performance should be the same as using the pci device in native > mode. Is > > à à it so? I have a PCI video card which would like to use inside a > VM running > > à à Windows XP. > > > > Xen supports PCI passthrough to _PV_ (paravirtual) guests without VT-d, > and has actually supported that for years. There are some potential > security > risks in this, since the PV guest gets full DMA control of the PCI > device > and could use it for malicious purposes. > > Xen PCI passthrough to HVM guests (=Windows) requires VT-d hardware > support. > > Also, PCI passthrough of a VGA/video card is not as simple as PCI > passthrough > of other cards (nic, disk controller, usb controller). > > VGA has lots of legacy stuff related to it, some memory ranges, IO > ports, VGA BIOS, > etc that have to be 'passed through' aswell, and emulated. > > Xen 4.0.0 will have PCI passthrough support of primary VGA adapters, but > it requires > VT-d support as stated already earlier. > > -- Pasi > > ps. There is actually a hack/patch available that allows PCI passthrough > to HVM guest > without VT-d, but that only works for the _first_ started HVM guest, and > it's experimental > and not supported in any way. iirc the patch is available in xen-devel > archives. > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list > [4]Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [5]http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users > > -- > Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. > > References > > Visible links > 1. mailto:Jan.Cescut@xxxxxx > 2. mailto:pasik@xxxxxx > 3. mailto:xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 4. mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > 5. http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |