[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] NFS vs SMb vs iSCSI for remote backup mounts
On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:15 AM, Simon Hobson <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Fair enough, but iSCSI is commonly used on NAS devices, and then export whatever filesystem is being used to the host. Which is why I am considering it. As to SMB vs NFS, a lot depends on the filesystem semantics your backup process needs. SMB should support WIndows file system sematics/metadata, NFS only supports Unix file system semantics/metadata. If that matters then the decision is made for you - eg if the backup is storing Windows files natively on the backup filesystem then you'll have to use SMB in order to retain the file metadata. There is a mixture of Windows & Linux data, but would NFS give me better performance for the Linux hosts? Also, when comparing (or asking about) file system performance, you need to specify the conditions. Performance is likely to be different between a setup storing individual files (ie lots of create,write,close,update directory operations) and a single large archive setup (ie where the backup program creates a big file and streams the backup data into it). sure, understandable, but this is almost a different subject :) The data that goes on there will be a mix of smalls files & large files
-- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers SoftDux Website: http://www.SoftDux.com Technical Blog: http://Blog.SoftDux.com Office: 087 805 9573 Cell: 082 554 7532 _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |