[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [Xen-users] [XCP] new version available


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: menox menox <menox.menox@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 19:41:53 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 10:42:40 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=rxuZQJ85HGH6Ou3GF7UYggVZg1dEz02o6helKM7klDfKa7yOMxZMRyKY54rmmgl4JI aI8jJ4GyLC0BQnATqYKDAQ49jubRJEYE9SrCuPaOEYR6RhDFSaSy4/jomTH6VyueVbYr WvK0wedT+yI0VH+DocSynYgvFgM5sLEm0jeZo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>


> > question may be what do I get with XCP that I don't get with Xenserver
> 5.5?
>
> The XCP snapshot = XenServer development trunk (except windows GUI, HA and
> WLB)
>
> So with XCP you get shiney new stuff like:
> * RBAC
> * memory ballooning
> * much more recent kernel (2.6.27 vs 2.6.18) etc
> * checkpoint/ rollback
>
> However with XenServer you get a fully polished thing which has been
> extensively stress-tested for ages.
>
> Cheers,
> Dave
>

So is that shiny new kernel a pv_ops kernel or has the xen patches been
forward ported again. I've not tested both the xen kernel and the pv_ops but
I keep hearing theirs a fairly major performance hit with pv_ops.

Grant McWilliams

A 0.1.1 release was posted on Jan 18, 2010 with the following additional features and fixes:

"Fault Tolerance" in more detail what this means? (code fix or new feature)
The HA
expected functionality?
How is it possible for upgarde from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1?

Menox
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.