[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] [XCP] new version available
- To: Dave Scott <Dave.Scott@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:37:25 -0800
- Cc: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:38:26 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=JRgJ1BN3wU9OIaOBrWhjFzM/GW5UFOR2LvbxxuFepFGpfajq7B3/URXaVWcfALxx8D ucyaztUexO+w7FfcsVyxKDRU7Gjj7T9l2qnvgo+edj+CScwsRp901TRJhDP7+zSkhBTk /jSubQU0u8wzIcqM8WkVncwzmdlHz7lyIUYag=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
> question may be what do I get with XCP that I don't get with Xenserver 5.5?
The XCP snapshot = XenServer development trunk (except windows GUI, HA and WLB)
So with XCP you get shiney new stuff like:
* RBAC
* memory ballooning
* much more recent kernel (2.6.27 vs 2.6.18) etc
* checkpoint/ rollback
However with XenServer you get a fully polished thing which has been extensively stress-tested for ages.
Cheers,
Dave
So is that shiny new kernel a pv_ops kernel or has the xen patches been forward ported again. I've not tested both the xen kernel and the pv_ops but I keep hearing theirs a fairly major performance hit with pv_ops.
Grant McWilliams
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
