[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] config.sxp pain - auto start?
Hi,I just noticed something diff between the 2 systems, the plain Centos 5 system that is completely up to date and the Centos 5 system having the Gitco repo. The virt-install on the Centos system is 566 lines and the Gitco one is 937. Since they both have RHEL as the author I assume they both came from Redhat but why is the Gitco system diff? I did an update on my plain Centos system and it didn't suck down a newer version of the script. Any ideas? Am I looking at this completely wrong? - Brian On Oct 8, 2009, at 3:26 PM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 3:29 AM, Brian Krusic <brian@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:One big problem I see is consistency. Wether GUI or CLI, in 3.4.1, SXP is the default.Last time I check virt-install is not part of Xen. It's a separate project by Redhat.And I personally have to assume others will need to manage this Xen infrastructure I've sold management on and have created.I do it the old-fashioned way : create old-style config files and symlinks manually :DSo I must conform to the way of SXP unfortunately. It does make things more complicated at first glance. Just my thoughts.Ask Redhat to have "on_xend_start/stop" parameter configurable when creating new guests? Also ask Xen developers to have a new "xm" command that can change the value of "on_xend_start/stop" without having to delete - edit - recreate domU? -- Fajar _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |