[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] xen and SAN.
> In my case, I want to use 3 physical servers and 1 SAN to manage 10-15 > virtual servers. > > What is the best solution : ISCSI (1Gb/s) or Fibre Channel (4Gb/s)? That depends on your needs. I'm personally skittish about passing disk blocks over ethernet and prefer FC, but it's expensive and if you believe [some of] the pundits, everything is going to ethernet eventually anyway. I think it's still safe to say though that at this time, if you need really reliable disk at theoretically-higher performance and you can afford it, go with FC. > What kind of device are you using ? 4Gb/s FC to EMC DMX-3 and IBM DS-4700 through Brocade fabrics. > For the moment, I'm interesting about HP technologies with > bladesystem c3000 and msa2324. FWIW, our experience with HP's blades has been less than thrilling, wouldn't recommend them. We have a few (5) of IBM's BladeCenters though and we've been extremely happy with them. I think they're more expensive up-front (?) but well worth it. John -- John Madden Sr UNIX Systems Engineer Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |