[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] xvda vs sda -performance-
- To: "Fajar A. Nugraha" <fajar@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: fmb fmb <feedmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 06:17:22 +0300
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 20:18:09 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QMzehMLjN+NnHPL0Wsss8/8MJNcASXiaYGPa+aV2i3XTUhz+Zdvf+/8runca+6dwc+ bIhsnjKROoxLtrbvU5IFak1aPpjR/9XCDgK4vZdWqRjPnkETZ4z+6NS2VE+LqS+rEXT4 kWzqsfyfbp7p7MdqnrB2waoBUL8pBNd5m46w0=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
thnx :)
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 4:39 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha <fajar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 2:48 AM, fmb fmb< feedmb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Is it still advisable to use xvda instead of sda in the fstab and cfg files?
It is recommended. One of the reasons is that newer pv_ops kernel will
silently use xvda regardless of what you put on cfg file :P
> Is this "Disk /dev/xvda2 doesn't contain a valid partition table" normal?
If you assign domU storage directly as xvda2, then it's normal.
--
Fajar
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|