[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-users] Paravirtualized vs HVM - how big is the performance gap?


  • To: Xen-user List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Tim Edwards <tedwards@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:08:05 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 02:08:46 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

We are currently in the situation of needing to use Scientific Linux 4.x
(a RHEL derivative) in paravirtualized mode. The problem is that the
virt-install command/libvirt don't support installing Scientific Linux
4.x (only 5.x) so I'm having great trouble installing SL4.x in a
paravirt domU.

I see 3 possibilities but don't really know if they are realistic so
need people's thoughts on them:

* Find a way to install SL4.x in a HVM domU and then convert that domU
to paravirt mode (I'm trying this now but with no success)

* There is some technique to allow booting of paravirt VMs off of .iso
images or over PXE (or any other method that could lead to a Kickstart
installation)?

* Just run 4.x in HVM mode - roughly how big is the performance impact
and how could I minimise it?

The hardware we're running this on supports AMD-V virtualisation, the
domain0 OS is Scientific Linux 5.3 x86_64.

Thanks

Tim Edwards

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.