[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] xen-on-xen
> > Xen does not meet it, because x86 architecture is not a "perfect" > > virtualizable one. > > As has been said... yes you can. It's not pretty, and certainly not > recommended. I've done it before using RHEL 5 and Xen running an > additional RHEL 5 HVM guest with Xen in that. It's certainly ugly, > and incredibly slow, but you can at least log in and use it. > > Now, that being said, would I try that "in the real world": absolutely > not. Would I use that in your case of testing customer backups: No > way... I thought that might be the case. It would be nice if I could make a DomU think that it was a Dom0. It would need to be able to re-export block devices and network devices, and maybe create domains, although that wouldn't be critical. Did the concept of 'driver domains' ever come to pass? James _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |