| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 Re: [Xen-users] gitco xen3.3 rpms for centos
 
To: jonr@xxxxxxxxxxFrom: Grant McWilliams <grantmasterflash@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2009 11:41:17 -0800Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxDelivery-date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 11:42:01 -0800Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma;	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to	:cc:content-type;	b=REQr/1GOx4w6oBW7+ZgC9n4TkfElofDXUyO7f3Z8mmjKp07LkE9cJCSIIdlDYfgt/T	DWDA3iDWS+izNYM10t/609V54rv4M6HMWs/JZdNQ2r2+lJSO3jug4HjyvQC2tWceGdA5	26/+j1hB6Kue4Pqbmgb1Wr1UYU3fUUukVL/Go=List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> 
 
 
 
 EVERYONE's using them! I use them in production now and have had no problems that I could attribute to the rpms themselves. Note, that I only use the x86_64 rpms.On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 10:54 AM,  <jonr@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote: 
Quoting Steven Timm <timm@xxxxxxxx >:
 
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Brian Krusic wrote:
 
 
Hi all,
 Has any one run these rpms?
 
 If so, are they reliable for a production box?
 
 I'm pretty conservative and usually stick with the vendor distros,  etc... but I may be missing out on some enhancements as the current  shipped version with Centos/RHEL is Xen 3.0.3.
 
 Don't believe everything RedHat puts in an rpm version string.
 The RedHat RPM says Xen 3.0.3 but inside it is really a significantly-
 modified xen 3.1.2. at least in version 5 update 2.
 That said, I have never tried the 3.3 rpms from gitco.
 Would also be interested to know anyone who has.
 
 
  
 Grant McWilliams
 
 Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use Windows."
 Now they have two problems.
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |