[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Distributed xen or cluster?
- To: xen-users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Rob Beglinger <rbeglinger@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:08:33 -0600
- Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:09:25 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GRfeQ3o5RATK0cLWbdpO/vNTvdF60b/UMzFGK7u0FDFR/jXG9LjqB+PLI9OgTgbWo2 PiYae+s3dPIsUbLDypXDZfV8X0sWEQz+M9vq2jhRqKiAY5opY2RRxN567k/3lkrcSlHj +hYvo5xJJgYu+DhMbOfNI/QQxexmMXHO9XCUM=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
That's what it looks like to me too.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 3:18 PM, lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for the lead Rob!
So, in essence, this is doing a sort of pre-migration, constantly updating the information that the new VM server would need in order to accept a migration command and fire up it's new servers.
So because the machines are constantly syncing this information, there's no need to do a manual migration as the data would always be there.
Nifty and seems like something that someone would eventually have realized :).
Is that kind of what it boils down to?
Mike
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
