[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] disk backend performance
I would like a step by step description of how to install AOE support between two Xen servers, in my case SUSE SP2. It seems like the ideal protocol for storage. Yours Federico -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stefan de Konink Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 10:23 AM To: Thomas Halinka Cc: Guillaume; Xen Users; Stefan de Konink Subject: Re: [Xen-users] disk backend performance On Fri, 28 Nov 2008, Thomas Halinka wrote: > i do not need any benchmarks. i measured that iscsi could saturate a > GB-Link with about 55-60% - AoE was about 80-85% at less CPU-Usage! My benchmarks for iSCSI vs NFS performance tests both saturate the links 10GE -> 1GE, while the first has a bit better < 10% performance. > Why is FC faster than iSCSI? Ah, it s because of the protocol. Non-sence. > > and preferably stability comparisons. > > open-iscsi has no stable releases yet. aoetools do have. There are also > many users complaining about iscsi-kernel-issues.... ...there is more than open-iscsi, in targets and initiators. (+ OS'es) Stefan _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |