[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Re: Backup


  • To: "Robert Dunkley" <Robert@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Paras pradhan" <pradhanparas@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:22:56 -0600
  • Cc: Ferenc Wagner <wferi@xxxxxxx>, Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:23:38 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=pw+fimH04LxIpI0oThxiKdEMCUAI9t/5cjlebm9yzuwv4NTUzCpMc6gb7A1EqmxmSr NhO4FGlysF/y2/GRgbcETA/M9kJkdJhCq4W0NAA6d0eRaGFA3O5HLIQ8EhH0exxa6ecg 8ShC27g2aA5HBIFn7oj5O8B3tnG9nW5oRGmsw=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>



On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Robert Dunkley <Robert@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Paras,

I'm not sure if your question was performance related but if your
storage system is local then you should see about 50Mbytes/second on a
single 7200RPM SATA disk or about 100Mbytes/sec for a single 15000Rpm
SAS drive; assuming they have very little disk activity from other VMs.
Raid 0 and Raid 5 arrays should be an order of magnitude faster.  So
speed wise that 9Mbytes/second looks too low.

Rob

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ferenc
Wagner
Sent: 20 November 2008 13:41
To: Paras pradhan
Cc: Xen Users
Subject: [Xen-users] Re: Backup

"Paras pradhan" <pradhanparas@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Here's what I did:
>
> To backup:
>
> 1) Saved the virtual machines' state using:
>
> xm save guest01 /guest01.save
>
> 2) lvcreate -s -L 2G -n guest01-snap /dev/vg/guest01-disk
>
> 3) Restored the VM
>
> xm restore /guest01.save
>
> 4) Used DD to create the image
>
> dd if=/dev/vg/guest01-snap of=/guest01.img
>
> 5) lvremove /dev/vg/guest01-snap
>
> To restore:
>
> 1) I turned off the VM (i don't like this)
>
> xm shutdown guest01
>
> 2) Then run:
>
> dd if=/guest01.img of=/dev/vg/guest01-disk
>
> 3) Turn back the VM on
>
> --
>
> My virtual machine is consuming 11GB of space. Now when i do DD while
> restoring it took a lot of time.
>
>
> ---
> 10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 1189.42 seconds, 9.0 MB/s
>
> ---
>
>
> Is this normal?

Impossible to tell without knowing a lots of details about your
storage system.

> I don't know if the process that I have used is fine or not. Need
> views on this.

Looks OK, but be prepared that your filesystems will be unclean after
restore.  If instead of turning the VM on you did an xm restore again,
then your filesystems would be OK, but some operations could be carried
out again in the restored domain.
--
Cheers,
Feri.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

The SAQ Group

Registered Office: 18 Chapel Street, Petersfield, Hampshire GU32 3DZ
SEMTEC Limited Trading as SAQ is Registered in England & Wales
Company Number: 06481952



http://www.saqnet.co.uk AS29219

SAQ Group Delivers high quality, honestly priced communication and I.T. services to UK Business.

DSL : Domains : Email : Hosting : CoLo : Servers : Racks : Transit : Backups : Managed Networks : Remote Support.

Find us in http://www.thebestof.co.uk/petersfield



As recommended  by agent, I have tested/restored with bs=4096 and now i am getting around 35mb/s in my 7200 RPM SATA drive. It works for me but still it should be more than that I guess.


Thanks
Paras.
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.