[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] GPL PV drivers for Windows 0.9.11-pre12
James Harper schreef: Oops, I meant the ML115, not 110. My mistake, so we do have identical systems..Well my system is an ML115 but probably otherwise identical. I haven't disabled any large send options at all anywhere to get my500mbit/second results on the 1Gbit/second network... You are correct. But that removed xen-utils, and now I no longer have 'xm' and 'xentop'? Re-installing xen-utils will, of course, remove xenstore-utils. Anyway, I pasted the output of xenstore-ls below.Maybe you need to install 'xenstore-utils'? # dpkg -S xenstore-ls xenstore-utils: /usr/bin/xenstore-ls xen-utils-3.1-1: /usr/lib/xen-3.1-1/bin/xenstore-ls xen-utils-unstable: /usr/lib/xen-unstable/bin/xenstore-ls I'm using Xen 3.2.something from etch-backports. My kernel is 2.6.18-xen-amd64 which I assume is built from the same source as yours. Mine is also from etch-backports That is only udp large send offload. The one you want to notice is 'tcp segmentation offload', which is 'on' on my system. My mistake again, tso is off and can't be enabled manually with ethtool. Here is the output of xenstore-ls: 0 = "" backend-id = "0" mac = "00:04:fc:40:e4:22" handle = "0" state = "4" backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/vif/12/0" tx-ring-ref = "15992" rx-ring-ref = "15960" event-channel = "7" feature-no-csum-offload = "0" feature-sg = "1" feature-gso-tcpv4 = "0" request-rx-copy = "1" feature-rx-notify = "1"Any idea why my tso is disabled and yours not? Btw, I'm happy with the results so far, so if it's too much trouble to get this working, we can leave this one alone. I guess it's my problem the system / kernel doesn't support tso, it's just strange that we both test on the same system with different results. Joost _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |