[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Debian domU interface naming strangeness
And in addition to this ;-) localhost:~# dmesg|grep -i eth netfront: Initialising virtual ethernet driver. netfront: device eth0 has flipping receive path. This is not an error I think. It's an information. If a fix mac adress isn't a working solution for you, you might try to place this on your DomU kernel command line: 'xennet.rx_copy' This is "copying recieve path".Perhaps genereally using a newer version of xen hypervisor is also a great idea ;-) Cheers, Alex Stephan Seitz schrieb: Additionally, add a fixed mac adress to your vif line in your domU config, likevif = [ 'mac=nn:nn:nn:nn:nn:nn,brigde=xxxxx' ]otherwise domU's udev will start counting again on every boot (say, mac address change)Alexander Hoßdorf schrieb:Hi, Have you got persistent mac adress configured for domU?You have a file called /etc/udev/rules.d/z25-persistent-net.rules in debian DomU.empty it and reboot DomU. Hope this helps. Cheers, Alex Ray Barnes schrieb:Hi all. I've got a Debian domU I created from scratch a few weeks ago. Every time I rolled it out previously in testing, it worked fine. But now it seems to make the ethernet device eth1 rather than eth0 in the domU: localhost:~# ifconfig -a eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:16:3E:3D:A0:30 BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) localhost:~# dmesg|grep -i eth netfront: Initialising virtual ethernet driver. netfront: device eth0 has flipping receive path. localhost:~# Note that as eth1, it routes traffic just fine. I can ifconfig it up and set an IP address, then get good routed connectivity. I'm seeing this eth1 naming issue on dom0s running CentOS 5.0 with the stock Xen 3.0.3 (yes that means literally 5.0, not a higher minor number), as well as Cent 5.1 with Xen 3.2.0 compiled from source. But obviously it presents a problem since I can't count on consistent naming. Thoughts? -Ray _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users__________ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-Version 3316 (20080731) __________E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users __________ Hinweis von ESET NOD32 Antivirus, Signaturdatenbank-Version 3316 (20080731) __________ E-Mail wurde geprüft mit ESET NOD32 Antivirus. http://www.eset.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |