[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] performace of disks
On Thursday 24 July 2008, Grant McWilliams wrote: > >3 - in the configuration of VM, exit one difference in performance > >between image file (disk:/) or LVM partition (phy:/) ??? > > I'm executing extensive lab based tests of various VM platforms and > configurations. It won't be done for months but my > testing of file vs. LVM disk images is nearly complete. I was expecting to > see drastic differences in speed between the two > but was fairly surprised that bonnie++ numbers were usually within 10% of > each other at most. LVM overall is faster but > not by the amount I would have expected. In half the cases the 10GB file > was as fast as LVM. Disk IO of a VM accessing LVM > was about another 10% off the Dom0 accessing the same LVM. does the choice of filesystem holding the image files make any difference? i guess ext3 would be among the best, but only if the data isn't journalled. also might be nice to add to the OCFS2 - GFS rivalry. -- Javier Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |