Re: [Xen-users] Xen Installation without virtualization enabled in Bios

[Daniel Kao <dkao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Did this resolve your domU's connectivity?  So the 3rd octect in the 
domU was incorrect?  That would explain pings working from one end and a 
gateway that's outside of your subnet range which prevents outside 
connectivity... or something similar...
Cheers,
Daniel

s@l wrote:
> My apologies, 
>
> Dom0 and DomU are both, in fact, on the same subnet.  I forgot Im only using
> a 16 bit subnet mask, I noticed the 3rd subnets of the IP for Dom0 and DomU
> were different and made this mistake... 
>
> Daniel Kao-2 wrote:
>   
> > I wouldn't be worried about the state listed by xm list.  It's probably 
> > fine.
> > "Eth1 on Dom0 and Eth1 on DomU are set to different subnets."
> >
> > This is the part I'm confused about.  If eth1 is used for dom0 for 
> > connectivity, and eth1 is bridged between dom0 and domU and domU is 
> > using eth1, why are they in different subnets?  If they are in different 
> > subnets (unless both are running down the same physical wire), you 
> > should be using a routed setup versus a bridged setup.
> > Cheers,
> > Daniel
> >     
--
Daniel Kao
Ãbermind, Inc.
Seattle, WA, U.S.A.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users