[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] The death of XEN by Novell
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 09:51:52AM -0400, Venefax wrote: > The Novell engineer showed me a technical document, which I did not write > the number, on the Novell web site, where it said: windows SMP using the > Novell driver crashes. On Monday I will talk to her and get the number. Hmm.. so it's a bug in Novell's windows driver or? And yeah, would be nice to see that document. > Also all the responses to my post in the list confirm that. The point is: > unless SMP works, the whole technology is useless, because what use would it > have a single VCPU machine? That´s why I am jumping over to Hyper-V. The > problem is that I don't know how good the emulation of Linux is under > Hyper-V. Does the network work fast? I use a SIP Server on the Linux side, > talking hundreds of times per second to SQL Server, so I need SMP 8 ways on > both ends. But my Linux softswiches also move megabytes of data in and out > of the network, media, voice. It requires low latency. Maybe I need to > forget about virtualizing Windows ands Linux together. > If you have two different server hardware now, just run paravirtualized linux vm's on the other one, and windows vm's on the other one.. -- Pasi > -----Original Message----- > From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:pasik@xxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 9:42 AM > To: Venefax > Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] The death of XEN by Novell > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 04:12:11PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 12:28:45AM -0400, Venefax wrote: > > > The Novell engineer showed me, and it has been confirmed in this list, > that > > > Windows with more than one virtual CPU crashes. An crashing it did. I > woke > > > up with angry calls from customers and when I logged in, all my 3 > Windows > > > VM's (two windows 2008 Datacenter with 32 GB and 8 VCPU and one Windows > 2003 > > > Enterprise with 16 GB and 8 VCPU's) were in blue screen. The memory > dump > > > process was stuck I guess because since the hard drives use the Novell > > > para-virtualized drivers, then at a blue-screen time you cannot collect > any > > > memory dump. But the fact is that the engineer showed me that advisory > note > > > in the Novell web site, saying I had been wasting my time, and now I am > > > buying a second $15.000 box to relocate my three windows VM´s. This is > joke. > > > > > > > Does Novell advertise their Xen in SLES supports Windows SMP? > > > > http://www.novell.com/rc/docrepository/public/37/basedocument.2008-06-10.975 > 2681390/SUSE_Linux_Enterprise_10_SP2_Virtualization_Technology_Support_Techn > ical_White_Paper_en.pdf > > "Virtual machine limits per VM" > > "Virtual CPUs, full virtualization (FV) 1-4" > > "Novell support is currently limited to four virtual CPUs for fully > virtualized VMs" > > Where did you read Novell supports 8 vCPUs for Windows? > > With a quick look I didn't find anything about Novell supported maximum > amount of > memory.. > > -- Pasi > > > > "Confirmed in this list" .. can you please send a link to such email? > > > > Is there a bugzilla entry about this bug in Novell's bug database or > Xensource's > > bugzilla? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: James Harper [mailto:james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > > Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 12:08 AM > > > To: Venefax; Mark Williamson; Antoine Benkemoun; Ky Srinivasan; Lynn > > > Bendixsen > > > Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; stephen.spector@xxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: RE: [Xen-users] The death of XEN by Novell > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: The death of XEN by Novell (case number 10406546031) > > > > > > > > According to Novell, Xen has a flaw that in fact means it is useless. > > > > > > Is this your interpretation of Novell's response or have Novell come out > > > and said that "Our product is useless"? Are you able to paste the text > > > of the support ticket or is it bound by some confidentiality agreement? > > > > > > > I > > > > have a single supported system with SLES SP2, where I have 3 Windows > > > VM's > > > > and 5 Linux VM's. In each of the Windows VM's I have 8 Virtual CPU's, > > > > because I have a vital SQL Server installed where my company runs all > > > its > > > > business. The data comes precisely from the Linux virtual machines, > > > and > > > > having the database "right there" has proven extremely efficient. But > > > all > > > > my three Windows VM's crashed simultaneously yesterday and I lost two > > > > hours of business. > > > > > > Can you tell us more about the crash? > > > > > > Was it really simultaneous (as best as you can tell) or did the domains > > > just crash at about the same time? > > > > > > What errors were in the logs (xm dmesg, dmesg, /var/log/xen/*)? > > > > > > Did Dom0 crash as well? > > > > > > The only time I've had more than one domain crash near-simultaneously > > > was when the oom-killer decided that the qemu-dm processes weren't > > > important and killed them to free up memory. > > > > > > > I am using of course the right Novell drivers, etc., > > > > every piece of the puzzle in place. Novell already checked that. The > > > > engineers showed me a technical note that says that having more than > > > one > > > > Virtual CPU in a Windows VM leads to crashes. > > > > > > Can you post a link to that technical note? Is it ">1 CPU leads to > > > crashes", or ">1 CPU may lead to crashes on this specific hardware under > > > these specific conditions"? Is it a Novell specific problem or a more > > > general problem? > > > > > > > But then we cannot have any > > > > windows VM at all, hello!!! This means that the $35.000 box that I > > > bought > > > > is the wrong box, because now I need to remove my windows VM and > > > create a > > > > separate windows installation, and order more hardware, spend more > > > money. > > > > It means that XEN is useless, because if it only can virtualize Linux, > > > > actually Virtuozzo (Open VZ) has a lot less overhead, far less. The > > > beauty > > > > of Xen is that it is supposed to virtualize Windows and Linux > > > together. > > > > Now, that dream is gone. In case somebody wants to look at my Novell > > > case > > > > number, it is 10406546031 > > > > > > Was this an invitation to internal Novell support personal or is it > > > viewable by anyone? > > > > > > Are you actually after assistance here or just sounding off? (that's a > > > genuine question, imho everyone is allowed to spit the dummy once in a > > > while.) > > > > > > Also, Novell aren't the only suppliers of Xen solutions... > > > > > > James > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |