[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] Release 0.9.5 of GPL PV Drivers for Windows


  • To: "Geoff Wiener" <gwiener@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 20:18:15 +1000
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 02 Jun 2008 03:18:50 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcjEE9VJQfx8Bmo5Qcq0VJYaZvghhQAKphFAABD4/TAABa5eIA==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Release 0.9.5 of GPL PV Drivers for Windows

> > Yes please to the screen shot, or at least give me the BSoD numbers.
> 
> Screen shot attached.

As you say below, 0x7B is a 'can't find boot device' error.

> > a copy of the 'disk=' lines in your config
> 
> For the machine that BSODs
> disk = [ 'tap:qcow:/xenimages/w2k3/w2k3.cow,hda,w' ]
> or
> disk = [ 'tap:qcow:/xenimages/w2k3/w2k3.cow,hda,w',
> 'file:/isorep/disc1.iso,hdc:cdrom,r' ]
> 
> > output of xenstore-ls /local/domain/<id>/device/vbd
> 
> 768= ""
>  backend-id = "0"
>  virtual-device = "768"
>  device-type = "disk"
>  state = "1
>  backend = "/local/domain/0/backend/tap/52/768"
> 
> >In that output there will be a 'backend=' line, I'd like to see the
> output of xenstore-ls on that too.
> 
> Unfortunately I can't get any output from that.. for example..
> 
> xenstore-ls /local/domain0/backend/tap/52/768
> or
> xenstore-ls /local/domain0/backend/tap/52/768/
> or
> xenstore-ls /local/domain0/backend/tap/52/

All your examples above say 'domain0' instead of 'domain/0'. Could that
be the problem or did you just make a typo in copying it into the email?

If that doesn't work, just do xenstore-ls /local/domain/0 and tell me
what the domain number is and I'll figure it out from there.

Another thing you could do is to boot with a file: block device, fire up
debugview, and then do a 'xm block-attach' to add the tap device at
runtime and see what debugview says.

I might have a go at using tap too to test it.

> With debugview running I selected "capture kernel, capture win32 &
> passthrough" and ran the iometer test on the machine with the 0.9.5
> drivers (RAW). The log is attached.

Hmmm... no evidence of unaligned buffer access. The queue only seems to
get to a maximum of 8 requests though during the tests which is a bit
strange.

> Lastly - what is the etiquette on cross posting to both user and devel
> lists like this?  I do not subscribe to the devel list?  Perhaps I
> should if I am going to post to it?   I just hit reply all...  Thanks.

Not sure... maybe we'll stick to -users for now just to be safe.

James


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.