[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] pciback question
- To: Boris <borisq22@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Todd Deshane" <deshantm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 May 2008 01:13:25 -0400
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 13 May 2008 22:13:54 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NI5Vev5I329x0KZdEfEEJVbrUklHXrV8XLUWQ5JSRSt1pySJtX6c9QQmaJJXdV9K/hCAhRS13ZGG67uhNFpn6qIM1ljZ6ZupT3fxIQvDs/4swimXqQXWTBBRF3x78osCoc+dA//DZDyQWQXaYFVwsaCxdEzSyHXZBgjMQ9XApwg=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Hi Boris,
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 12:44 AM, Boris < borisq22@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi there,
I know assigning devices, such as pci network card, to domu with
pciback works really rocks. I also know that pciback method only works
with paravirtual domu, right?
Well, what about full-virtualized domu's?
Anybody knows something about it? There are a few threads at the line below that suggest that basic support
was added in 3.2, and that IOMMU support (e.g VT-d) is needed as well.
Others may have more details to add.
Cheers,
Todd
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
