[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Xen 3.2 & CentOS
Vinod Kumar wrote: Huh. Interesting. RedHat's SRPM's are a bit more sophisticated than those for Xensource, traditionally, so I'm not shocked you found a discrepancy building it for x86_64. Perhaps you can review the differences in the .spec files and see how RedHat did it?On 2/27/08, *Nico Kadel-Garcia* <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:John Morris wrote: > Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >> Can't you install rhe Xensource.com <http://Xensource.com> RPM's as upgrades to the >> Centos/RHEL RPM's? I've certainly done so with CentOS and RHEL, 4.x >> and 5.x. There are some subtle differences between them, and I >> haven't tried the 3.2 RPM's myself. > Can you point me to those? The xen.org <http://xen.org> RPMs at > http://xen.org/download/dl_32rhel5.html don't include 64-bit versions, > and going to xensource.com <http://xensource.com>, I get lost in a maze of marketing. > > John > Looks like you need to recompile from the SRPM. Do you have a 64-bit system to do it on?I was looking for xen 3.2 64bit for the similar reason (32 bit domU crashes on 64bit dom0).I tried to build the source rpm of xen 3.2 (downloaded from http://bits.xensource.com/oss-xen/release/3.2.0/centos-5.1/xen-3.2.0-0xs.centos5.src.rpm) using rpmbuild on a CentOS 5.1(x86_64), and I got the below error: RPM build errors:Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloaderPlease let me know the changes required for building the src.rpm on 64 bit system? I was curious to know about the existing installation and I found that the package xen-3.0.3-41.el5-x86_64, installs all the binaries and libs in /usr/lib64/xen, but puts the hvmloader in /usr/lib/xen! Thanks,Vinod _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |