[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] New binary release of GPL PV drivers for Windows
Hi Pasi, I wasn't able to get Windows XP Professional x64 running with gplpv until James released 0.8.0 if his great drivers. So my answer is a bit delayed: Equipment: core2 duo, 2,66GHz, Areca PCI-X Raid 6 over 8 disks System is running Xen 3.2.0 64bit, dom0 is 2.6.18.8 Tested HVM domU is running XP Pro x64, Version 2003, SP 2, tested with iometer 2006-07-27 stable. --- Disk/IO using a gplpv'd disk: pattern: 4k, 50% read, 50% write total iops: ~14180 read ~7045-7065 write ~7025-7045 total MB/s: ~55 read ~27.5 write ~27.5 (looks like 50%...) avg IO response time: ~0.071 ms max IO response time: ~19.438 ms cpu utilization: 0% (??) pattern: 32k, 50% read, 50% write total iops: ~6900 read ~3435 write ~3450 total MB/s: ~215 read ~107.5 write ~107.5 avg IO response time: ~0.145 ms max IO response time: ~21.525 ms cpu utilization: ~5.52% pure read operations with 32k pattern shows about 280 MB/s throughput pure write operation with 512B pattern shows about 8.5 MB/s througput --- Disk/IO using a QEMU disk: pattern: 4k, 50% read, 50% write total iops: ~3650 read ~1828 write ~1790 total MB/s: ~14 read ~7 write ~7 avg IO response time: ~0.276 ms max IO response time: ~55.242 ms cpu utilization: 98.7% pattern: 32k, 50% read, 50% write total iops: ~3064 read ~1370-1390 write ~1360 total MB/s: ~84 read ~42-44 write ~40-42 avg IO response time: ~0.387 ms max IO response time: ~77.450 ms cpu utilization: ~76.8% pure read operations with 32k pattern shows about 94 MB/s throughput pure write operation with 512B pattern shows about 1.8 MB/s througput --- (filebased) disk IO at dom0 (random, using dbench): 10 workers on ext3,defaults: ~660 MB/s 10 workers on xfs,defaults: ~620 MB/s hdparm shows 3.3 GB/s cached and 366 MB/s buffered Pasi Kärkkäinen schrieb: On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:22:55AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 06:21:41PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 12:30:51PM +0100, Stephan Seitz wrote:If someone knows a Windows Benchmarking Suite, I'll do real tests. I know myrecent tests are not comparable to any value, but I'm a little bit handycappedon windows ;)You could use IOmeter http://www.iometer.org. It's a widely used disk benchmarking tool on Windows. It's easy to run benchmarks using different requests sizes, different number of outstanding io's etc..With small requests sizes (512 bytes or 4k) you can measure how many IOPS (IO operations per second) you can get, and with big request sizes (64+ kB) you can measure how much throughput you can get.. Changing the number of outstanding IO's means how many IO operations are active at the same time (optimal values depends on the storage used, and onthe queue depth of the hardware, drivers and kernel).Note that IOmeter wants to use raw disk devices, so don't create any partitions or format the disk before using IOmeter.And please share your benchmarking results :) -- Pasi -- Stephan Seitz Senior System Administrator *netz-haut* e.K. multimediale kommunikation zweierweg 22 97074 würzburg fon: +49 931 2876247 fax: +49 931 2876248 web: www.netz-haut.de <http://www.netz-haut.de/> registriergericht: amtsgericht würzburg, hra 5054 Attachment:
s_seitz.vcf Attachment:
signature.asc _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |