[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Simplest OS possible?

To: "John Krautheim" <jkrautheim@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Paul Reiber" <reiber@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:56:48 -0800
Delivery-date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:57:20 -0800
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=N8Fa+PpwtUwUiG668n9NBwwY7xM5NoMp9LBj/gN4PvtN/rUVS6VGNK+0gRmIonR6sUuCDHi3Xr/B8oVwUic0q9PJfutoy/uhzM5zHy7Dze/SldG8c2eqK5mlQtZ28i+acCqz1peyu2eZ29MVYxj+NvSaT3RuW3LGlKudzCf3yp8=
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 2/16/08, Javier Guerra <javier@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Busybox plus kernel usually goes around 5Meg or less

...but this leads us straight back to Gerhard's question, as to the
purpose for the domU.

AFAIK Busybox is without virtual memory support; maybe that's
changed?    If it's still without VM support, that severely hampers
many potential use cases.

-pbr
http://reiber.org

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

References:
- [Xen-users] Simplest OS possible?
  - From: John Krautheim
- Re: [Xen-users] Simplest OS possible?
  - From: Sadique Puthen
- Re: [Xen-users] Simplest OS possible?
  - From: Javier Guerra

Prev by Date: [Xen-users] kernel problem
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] XEN in VirtualBox?
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Simplest OS possible?
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Simplest OS possible?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.