[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-users] Vanilla kernel 2.6.23 gets error "guest type xen-3.0-x86_32 not supported by xen kernel" when compiled with paravirt support
This is my first time posting to this mailing list, so please let me know if I'm posting to the wrong place or otherwise not following the protocol. I am trying to boot up a custom paravirtualized kernel in Xen domU. I have been following this thread from the same mailing list that has been extremely helpful, but I still get an error: http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2007-10/msg00378.html My setup is Fedora Core 8 installation of Xen and dom0, which includes xen-3.1.0-13 and 2.6.21-2950.fc8xen Fedora kernel. I can create a Fedora Core 8 domU using xm create. So at this point I'm just trying to compile the vanilla kernel with paravirtual extensions to replace Fedora's kernel in the config file. My procedure is as follows: - download vanilla kernel 2.6.23 from kernel.org - make defconfig - edit .config and set all "xen" and "paravirt"setting to yes (config file attached) - make vmlinux - gzip vmlinux (... this step by following advice in the above mentioned thread) - cp vmlinux.gz /boot/vmlinuz - Then try to boot the kernel with the attached config file At this point, an error occurs and domain-builder-ng.log reflects the following entries: ... xc_dom_parse_elf_kernel: xen-3.0-x86_32: 0xc0100000 -> 0xc06d3000 ... xc_dom_compat_check: supported guest type: xen-3.0-x86_32p xc_dom_compat_check: supported guest type: hvm-3.0-x86_32 xc_dom_compat_check: supported guest type: hvm-3.0-x86_32p xc_dom_boot.c:108: panic: xc_dom_compat_check: guest type xen-3.0-x86_32 not supported by xen kernel, sorry When I boot the image that works (compiled from vanilla kernel 2.6.23 by Mark and attached in the abovementioned thread), it indeed boots and instead the log has the entries one would expect: ... xc_dom_parse_elf_kernel: xen-3.0-x86_32p: 0xc0100000 -> 0xc0420000 ... x86_compat: guest xen-3.0-x86_32p, address size 32 ... xc_dom_compat_check: supported guest type: xen-3.0-x86_32p <= matches xc_dom_compat_check: supported guest type: hvm-3.0-x86_32 xc_dom_compat_check: supported guest type: hvm-3.0-x86_32p Any idea what I am doing wrong? One curious thing I've noticed is when I look at elf notes in my broken image, they look a bit different from the image that works. Don't know if that matters: $ readelf -n marks_vmlinux Notes at offset 0x002cd2b8 with length 0x000000e8: Owner Data size Description Xen 0x00000006 Unknown note type: (0x00000006) Xen 0x00000004 Unknown note type: (0x00000007) Xen 0x00000008 Unknown note type: (0x00000005) Xen 0x00000004 Unknown note type: (0x00000003) Xen 0x00000004 NT_VERSION (version) Xen 0x00000004 NT_ARCH (architecture) Xen 0x0000002a Unknown note type: (0x0000000a) Xen 0x00000004 Unknown note type: (0x00000009) Xen 0x00000008 Unknown note type: (0x00000008) $ readelf -n my_vmlinux Notes at offset 0x012d1330 with length 0x0000010c: Owner Data size Description Xen 0x00000006 Unknown note type: (0x00000006) Xen 0x00000004 Unknown note type: (0x00000007) Xen 0x00000008 Unknown note type: (0x00000005) Xen 0x00000004 Unknown note type: (0x00000003) Xen 0x00000004 NT_VERSION (version) Xen 0x00000004 NT_ARCH (architecture) Xen 0x0000002a Unknown note type: (0x0000000a) Xen 0x00000003 Unknown note type: (0x00000009) <= this Xen field looks different Xen 0x00000008 Unknown note type: (0x00000008) GNU 0x00000014 NT_GNU_BUILD_ID (unique build ID bitstring) Let me know if you have any thoughts or if there is any additional info I can provide. Thanks, Tom Attachment:
xen.cfg Attachment:
domain-builder-ng.log.bad Attachment:
domain-builder-ng.log.good Attachment:
.config _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |