[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?


  • To: <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "[STD]Ein" <ein@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 01:58:14 -0600
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 00:01:10 -0800
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcgkNzm0b7xiRMQjQBu91LbibLQGfAAANwuA

Debian Etch includes Xen 3.1 packages (2.6.18-5-xen-686 packages), and you
can get 3.1 for Sarge in backports.  I'm using the Debian packages on an x86
system and haven't had any issues, or found any shortcomings.

-----Original Message-----
From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kanour-xen
Sent: November 11, 2007 1:47 AM
To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-users] xen - binary or compilation?

Hi.

Just simple question. I have Debian distribution. In the past I always 
compiled Xen from source. However, Xen packages are already included in 
Debian Stable (amd64).

What is worth? Compiling or using binary installation of newest Xen 3.1 
or using the debian packages of Xen 3.0.3?

Thanks for your opinion.

Jiri

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.