[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Xen without the X
Shane D. Johnson wrote: Ahh. Not an unusual approach, but resolving the compilation dependencies sounds quite painful.Nico,I am trying to build a minimal server with Apache and Qmail(Most likely) in separate domains with only the programs and services necessary to run these programs on each domain. I am doing this to keep the disk space small (for performance and backup), the performance high , and the security threats down (only have running what you need).Thanks Shane Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:Shane D. Johnson wrote:Why do you want to do this? Unweaving the X requirements for the VNC or SDL graphical console support sounds like a great deal of pain.Hello, I need some help please.I want to compile xen-3.1.0 for use on a server that doesn't have X11 or Xorg installed. I would like to control the servers through SSH and Telnet (unless you have a suggestion for something better (more Secure)). I wouldn't be using VNC or Console(Unless I have to). I have made the kernels and now only need the tools to control xen. I have searched the internet and asked for help before(And seen others ask) but can't seem to find the Documentation or help I need to only compile the needed components. If anyone could point me in the right direction I would appreciate it. If I need to take this to a different list please let me know.Thank you Shane Do not use telnet. Spending all that work on security, then using telnet, is like picking a 37-character mixed case password and then taping it to your monitor because you can't remember it: it rather defeats the purpose. It may be possible to compile, then rip out the X installation over the objections of the Xen dependencies. Have you tried that? _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |