[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Re: HVM domU Solaris 10 (Marc Patino G?mez)
- To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- From: "sven waeyenbergh" <sven.waeyenbergh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 20:08:23 +0200
- Delivery-date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 11:09:15 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=aars8DnQVRN5/DEDuDnrtQXb17DFZ7Br39yViU+P3SB2kZj3XYEKL4fphV0QMjotmQ0TZTbkcsywWoMTACh+0scKmhbfpdAwcKQJENvR3JOCDA7Gd6xk/Cado3AQYlamWSDDrpqNgzzVStKSi8E1OTclISXcuFPPfxYFAPWghVY=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
thanks a lot for this info, i think i'm switching sides to AMD now :p
A quick glance trough the article seems to point to the Opteron 2347 as a nice favorite,
but they do not seem to be available in Europe yet. i'll wait a bit more.
I see these also seem to have some iommu implemented, that could prove VERY neat for a xen setup,
if the iommu will be supported by xen.
Thanks a lot,
Sven
On 9/22/07, Kent Watsen <kent@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I can't answer your question with empirical evidence, but I'm just about
to buy a large-ish AMD-based system due to what I've read on this list
and elsewhere for a couple years. I'm going this way in part because I
feel that AMD has a more correct virtualization implementation, in the
same way that they have a more correct quad-core implementation, and in
part because their 2- and 4-socket quad-core chips are an incredible
value relative to Intel's chips
(http://anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=3091&p=2) - assuming
top-performance isn't your goal... Besides, its fun to support the
underdog ;)
Best,
Kent
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
