| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
 Re: [Xen-users] Why does domU Windows have to be re-registered after	Xen 3.1.0 dom0 upgrade
 
To: Derek <xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>From: "Emre Erenoglu" <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx>Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:21:09 +0200Cc: Xen Users <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>Delivery-date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 09:21:57 -0700Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta;	h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references;	b=Q4k8LqoIAgYkv74BkD21oEgAdhurDrjviY45oQ7TCN3vaxKlpc9QiN7tgHFHZSPMp20kE+lpd73QI0woyaM3HZcxmMScyjp58AXQjk2nsy3hiXrVa96obIB802Fw7iN++sLLeO6ip4D47fCrk2MSZh6HTe2naprccihf+XDGkZE=List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> So let's hope that you won't run out of these "activation" rights for successive Xen upgrades...
 
 Emre
 
 
 On 9/11/07, Derek <
xen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi,   It let me reactivate just fine.  Didn't even require me to re-enter the many-digit code on the sticker, it just said to click on the re-activate link, paused about a minute, and then announced that activation was successful.
   Derek
 
 
On 9/11/07, Emre Erenoglu <erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
> wrote:
The more important question can be, if XP lets you re-activate the OS or tells you to call Redmond?
 Emre
 
 
 
Hi all,_______________________________________________
 Just wondering if anybody knows the answer to this mystery?
 
 I upgraded my Dom0 from Xen 3.0.4 + kernel 2.6.16.33-xen to Xen 3.1.0 + kernel 2.6.18-xen.
 
 After the upgrade, my domU (WInXP home edition) popped up a message saying that it needed to be re-registered with Microsoft, owing to significant changes in the hardware environment on which it is running.  Something about windows genuine advantage (ie. they suspect it's a pirate copy?)
 
 Just wondering...  Does anybody know what changes these might be?  There's nothing obvious that I can tell, but something about my new Xen 3.1.0 environment is different enough to upset Microsoft.  It's the same memory size, same peripherals etc.
 
 The only thing I can think of is PAE versus non-PAE.  My new 3.1.0 installation is PAE, my old one was not (as far as I know anyway).   Could that be it?
 
 Not critical that I get to the bottom of this, but I'm curious.
 
 Derek.
 
 Xen-users mailing list
 Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
 
 
 
 --
 Emre Erenoglu
 erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
 
 
 
 --
 Emre Erenoglu
 erenoglu@xxxxxxxxx
 _______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users 
 |