[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] hvm performance
> -----Original Message----- > From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tony Hoyle > Sent: 28 May 2007 22:42 > To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Xen-users] hvm performance > > Hi > > I've been running xen with linux guests for a while now and > thought I'd > try windows as I have a new server. All seemed to go fine except > performance is *horrible* - I'm currently installing Win2003 SP2 and > it's been running over 12 hours (thank god for vnc) - each individual > file is taking between 3 and 4 seconds each. I can install Vista in about 20-30 minutes. XP or 2K3 is roughly the same amount of time - not much different from the native install. > > Server is an intel E6600 with plenty of memory so should be > pretty fast. > > I had a look around and it is apparently the performance of qemu-dm > that's critical. That's currently pinned at 1% CPU usage and using > 332MB of memory (pushing dom0 into swap as I only gave it 256MB) - is > this normal? CPU load apart from that is: Doesn't seem like the normal behaviour I see. I use 256MB in Dom0, but installing Windows works just fine in this setup. What version of Xen are you using? What is the host? -- Mats _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |