[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen HD performance


  • To: Sami Dalouche <skoobi@xxxxxxx>
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 08:05:14 +0100
  • Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 15 May 2007 00:03:18 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=EKZ+mC88LAOPlFBX9kuIYc6vNemqgPbCuXQuZe7a4+8q6PGjI33pXgZ7P5XWP92z1LV1kroRqooCAnx+54rhO3Ei8vIeLT9IrK2smZQLsNB3fLd8HZAx7cac20V5dE+vQ5YudbDwBhZ+p0tS22D8D1b5X0m/vnpgMcfJB6dfSaE=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Sami Dalouche wrote:
Hi,

Can anyone point me to some information about the behaviour of Xen
concerning Disk I/O.

What happens on my computer is that whenever I activate Xen, the I/O
capability of my hard drives is divided by the number of Xen virtual
machines.
Even when the other domains are not busy? I mean, disk I/O bandwidth and bandwidth to the disk controller has to be shared, but if only one domain is using it, I'd expect it to be disk bound: disk I/O is expensive in a virtualized environment, but it shouldn't cost *too* much if hte guest domains are not churning the disk.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.