[Top] [All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Bonding ­ dom0 or dom1 ? and why is vif1.1 missing in DomU?

  • To: "xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Julian Pawlowski <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 08:57:50 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 00:57:17 -0700
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcdkfCFBX4cimtBvEduBTAAX8vMDhQ==
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-users] Bonding ­ dom0 or dom1 ? and why is vif1.1 missing in DomU?
Am 12.03.2007 8:18 Uhr schrieb "Ulrich Windl" unter
<ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> No unexpected messages in /var/log/messages?

Nothing :-)

> Which bonding mode do you use,

mode 0 but I think mode 1 should also be possible without any problem.

> and do you use physical access to the NICs in DumU?

No physical access from domU, the vif is connected to the xenbr0 interface
which itself is connected to bond0.


Julian


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

 

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.