|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Strange Networking Issue
jez wrote: Tried it both ways and more. I added it as /22 recently simply to show that it is consistent with a working IP, .240On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 07:08:28PM -0500, Jonathon Jones wrote:Hi Jon, your first post says that additional IPs on eth0 in Dom1 are /32 not /22 - which is it? Also, can you fill in the details on the following: 1. "ip addr show" on Dom0
[root@trinity domU]# ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: vif0.0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
3: veth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
4: vif0.1: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
5: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
link/ether 00:30:48:78:d6:07 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 75.126.153.178/29 brd 75.126.153.183 scope global eth1
inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe78:d607/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
6: vif0.2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
7: veth2: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
8: vif0.3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
9: veth3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 qdisc noop
link/ether 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
10: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether 00:30:48:78:d6:06 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.10.16.2/26 brd 10.10.16.63 scope global eth0
inet6 fe80::230:48ff:fe78:d606/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
11: peth1: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
12: sit0: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop
link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
13: xenbr1: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::200:ff:fe00:0/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
14: vif1.0: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 32
link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
15: vif2.0: <BROADCAST,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 32
link/ether fe:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 scope link
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2. "brctl show" on Dom0
[root@trinity domU]# brctl show
bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces
xenbr1 8000.feffffffffff no peth1
vif0.1
vif1.0
vif2.0
3. "route -n" on Dom0 [root@trinity domU]# route -n Kernel IP routing tableDestination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 75.126.153.176 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.248 U 0 0 0 eth1 10.10.16.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.192 U 0 0 0 eth0 169.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 0 0 eth1 10.0.0.0 10.10.16.1 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth0 0.0.0.0 75.126.153.177 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 eth1 4. The vif configurations for Dom1 and Dom2 (from their config files) In Dom1: [root@secure network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt # for the documentation of these parameters. TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=75.126.154.240 NETMASK=255.255.252.0 GATEWAY=75.126.153.177 [root@secure network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0-range0 IPADDR_START=75.126.154.241 IPADDR_END=75.126.154.243 CLONENUM_START=0 NETMASK=255.255.252.0Note: I have been using ip addr add/del to test the IP's out but for simplicity I added them using the range config above. Neither way is working. I also have my ISP checking on whether this is a routing issue on their side, although I don't see hwo it could be when .240 and .244 are routing to Dom1 and Dom2 respectively. In Dom2: [root@secure network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0 # Please read /usr/share/doc/initscripts-*/sysconfig.txt # for the documentation of these parameters. TYPE=Ethernet DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=static ONBOOT=yes IPADDR=75.126.154.244 NETMASK=255.255.252.0 GATEWAY=75.126.153.177 [root@secure network-scripts]# cat ifcfg-eth0-range0 IPADDR_START=75.126.154.245 IPADDR_END=75.126.154.247 CLONENUM_START=0 NETMASK=255.255.252.0 5. The settings for (network-script ...) and (vif-script ...) in your xend configuration file. In Dom1: vif = [ '' ] In Dom2: (as an experiment which didn't change anything) vif = [ 'ip=75.126.154.244' ] Neither DomU has any other network settings in the config. 6. The version of xen you are running. xen-3.0.4_1-install-x86_32p.tgz is the file I downloaded form xensource.comuname reports 2.6.16.33-xen #1 SMP Mon Jan 8 14:39:10 GMT 2007 i686 athlon i386 GNU/Linux Depending on what you come back with, I might have more questions.I prefer bridged simply because it seems the most simple setup normally. I am open to suggestions but I am looking for the easiest to maintain because I am frankly not a networking guru...although I am learning a lot from this.Also, do you have any idea if you would prefer a bridged or a routed setup? jez Thanks much! Jon _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |