Re: [Xen-users] Strange Networking Issue

["Nico Kadel-Garcia" <nkadel@xxxxxxxxx>]

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Martin Hierling

To: xen-users

Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:23 AM

Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Strange Networking Issue

Hi,

2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 1000
    link/ether 00:16:3e:3d:20:f0 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 75.126.154.240/22 brd 75.126.155.255 scope global eth0
    inet 75.126.154.241/22 brd 75.126.155.255 scope global secondary eth0:0
    inet 75.126.154.242/22 brd 75.126.155.255 scope global secondary eth0:1
    inet 75.126.154.243/22 brd 75.126.155.255 scope global secondary eth0:2
    inet6 fe80::216:3eff:fe3d:20f0/64 scope link
       valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever

You can see that all IP's are added in the same way yet only .240 is pingable.  I can add the IP manually to dom0 and get it to ping so I'm thinking there is some bug in this latest version of xen.  Does anybody else have any other conclusion?

pingable means from outside, right. So are there any firewalls between outside and xen?
have you tested any other service, like http? try that.
does your xen box get/answer the ping? tcpdump -i eth0 icmp. Do you see any echo/echo-replys generated from your box?
According to your first mail, eth1 is the if with the public interface!  Why are the addresses configured on eth0?

There's been a lot of previous discussions about setting up firewalls, especially iptables, for Dom0 to allow guests their necessary access. I'd still love to see a clear walkthrough guide for this, though.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users