[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] No eth0 in domU...


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Jerry Amundson" <jamundso@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:10:14 -0600
  • Delivery-date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:09:40 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=L2/dWf7IAWeLk+9BTqAuIs/rOntXFoR4PGTOLPAZJ0qUfc3DbwJ/OfeE5seZ5WEcbwdnNSpYFo3JLsV5RMYZSjZ5+BcU+J1HJjifDM4wxo/5OkKV87XW9d5KnJRjLgaerftQk3p0s1SN1mJzwAltvThmvEUL4btA+jDTK8Ysyyo=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 2/24/07, Kraska, Joe A (US SSA) <joe.kraska@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Ran across this problem recently. Below attached worked for me on a
> > reboot. Still gathering "low level linux administration expertise"
> > here. Would one alternative to the modprobe.conf be to recompile the
> > domU kernel such that it needs no such modprobe entry?

> Yes, but why? Having it there keeps the install "more normal"...

Fair response. OTOH, it's not normal for me to have to make manual
modprobe.conf entries when installing a redhat OS. Will contemplate
the implications overall. Thank you.

Agreed. And that's a packaging problem. The rpm should have udev
awareness added to it so the "usual" device magic is done, even though
the device is virtual...

jerry

--
"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain!"

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.