[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier.

To: "Christopher G. Stach II" <cgs@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Jacques Normand <jnormand@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 11:51:45 -0600
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 23 Dec 2006 09:51:47 -0800
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Mail-followup-to: "Christopher G. Stach II" <cgs@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 03:01:32PM -0200, Christopher G. Stach II wrote:
> I believe the requirement that the addressing matches between dom0 and
> domU still stands for paravirt.  They both need to be PAE.  I dunno
> about the SEGV, though.

Yes, that still stands, and I use the same for xen, dom0 and domu.

jacques

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

References:
- [Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier.
  - From: Jacques Normand
- Re: [Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier.
  - From: Christopher G. Stach II

Prev by Date: [Xen-users] Wallclock Changing Woes
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Xen/Windows on AMD; use of PCI / USB
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Problem at the 4G barrier.
Next by thread: [Xen-users] AMD ATHLON 64 X2 5200+ AM2 and Supermicro H8SMA-2 A64/Opteron a good choice?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.