[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Why the unmodified guest os can run on xen while hardware supports VT?

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Ulrich Windl" <ulrich.windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 09:01:10 +0100
Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 00:01:37 -0800
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
Priority: normal

On 26 Nov 2006 at 22:48, Javier Guerra wrote:

> The rings mechanism implemented by Intel processors since the 80386 (now 

I think it was implemented in the 80286 already (the first CPu with "protected 
mode").

Ulrich


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

References:
- [Xen-users] Why the unmodified guest os can run on xen while hardware supports VT?
  - From: Eric Zhang
- Re: [Xen-users] Why the unmodified guest os can run on xen while hardware supports VT?
  - From: Javier Guerra

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-users] Time/clock issues with Xen 3.0.3?
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-users] losing network packets on heavy load, xen 3.0.3
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Why the unmodified guest os can run on xen while hardware supports VT?
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-users] Why the unmodified guest os can run on xen while hardware supports VT?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.