[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] Xen + Windows + Intel VT-x stability
noniko wrote: > Hi, everyone > >> For HVM, I'd recommend 10.2.alpha4. > > Yes, I completely agree! I'm looking forward to 10.2 being released. > So I would need no more to write a complicated hvm file... > > By the way, I made some report on "Is virtualized Windows really > usable in practice?" topic. > > http://cropcrusher.web.infoseek.co.jp/shufuden/winxen/index.html > > I did not uploaded this report directly (making a link, though) on > openSUSE wiki because it's not so directly related to SUSE itself. > > The above document itself was created using Openoffice.org 2.0 on > Windows VM. I spent 3 hours for it but most of times were killed with > thinking up English sentence, not by performance problems of Windows VM. > > Thank you very much for sharing your nice report. I will of course suggest it on my Linux forum. Terje J. Hanssen _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |