Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-users] Differences in performance between file and LVM based images

To: "Petersson, Mats" <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>

From: Alex Iribarren <Alex.Iribarren@xxxxxxx>

Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:32:30 +0200

Delivery-date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 08:34:04 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; s=beta; d=cern.ch; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Kr2fXaG2W563vg3nkHETPaQ8Al2Ag2qPEZzHefWjSqO4ImyM22ttj5UIp7PAUVPEBA1Pk0QF1zH6pKWhnE+McpvN9Uc5APSG9aolf3e8HkLwvS8zME5DXR/RuK4Wh2AP;

Keywords: CERN SpamKiller Note: -52 Charset: west-latin

List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Openpgp: url=http://www.cern.ch/Alex.Iribarren/AlexIribarren_0xCAE83E64.asc

Petersson, Mats wrote: > 1. Test with noticably larger test-area (say 10GB or so). Will do, I didn't do this before because of lack of space. > 2. Test multiple domains simultaneously to see if file-based approach is > still the fastest in this approach. I don't think I'll be able to do this, I don't have enough space. I also don't have time to make space, I'm off on holiday tomorrow. :) Maybe someone else can try this out? > 3. Test the new (unstable) Blktap model. Same "no time" excuse, although I would like to try xen unstable. It will have to wait until I get back and have no real work to do. Cheers, Alex

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

©2013 Xen Project, A Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. All Rights Reserved.
Linux Foundation is a registered trademark of The Linux Foundation.
Xen Project is a trademark of The Linux Foundation.