[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Windows on XEN with Vanderpool

To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Chris Brookes" <cbrookes@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 21:41:08 -0500
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 May 2006 19:41:45 -0700
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=C4yfTE/rxJjHRAOXh5XB3sXHAcrLMgIbZjV7zrCgyYWvV178qoZEPbknyFmc3f9NWfdVSrmDCUggiDOLqBX7fqITpsMbXgxpHxQSYRqlWWJeg5au/2232aOR5jQoQ4Y5E+Ge1jvtXGCng5v40nOSfpMXamkEVVBJjjVGblEDyvA=
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 30/05/06, Petersson, Mats <Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx> wrote:

- I'm just referring to what is on our web-site at the moment. The Rev F
Turion 64 X2 is using around 31-33W, and the older single cores are
24-25W, so there's a little bit of difference... Although you could


Are those Turion 64 X2 TL-XX processors going to be available retail
and compatible with a widely available desktop board? I'd really like
to get 2 cores at 1.6+ghz for 35 watts in to my basement server :-)

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

References:
- RE: [Xen-users] Windows on XEN with Vanderpool
  - From: Yves Dorfsman
- RE: [Xen-users] Windows on XEN with Vanderpool
  - From: Petersson, Mats

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-users]Problem in the very first step of installation of xen
Next by Date: RE: [Xen-users] Windows on XEN with Vanderpool - or "AMD availability" ;)
Previous by thread: RE: [Xen-users] Windows on XEN with Vanderpool
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Windows on XEN with Vanderpool
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.