[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI-LUN as VBD
feel curious, have u ever tried live migration with an iscsi vbd? thx. ming On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 13:19 +0100, Matthew Wild wrote: > On Tuesday 23 May 2006 13:02, Tijl Van den Broeck wrote: > > On 5/23/06, Matthew Wild <M.Wild@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I have iSCSI vbd based domUs working in SuSE10.1, xen-3.0.2 and > > > open-iscsi-0.5.545-9 against an IET server. > > > > What system do you have ? I used the standard suse 10.1 pkgs on a x86_64 > > system but open-iscsi-0.5.545 caused a crash on the iscsi modules. iSCSI > > didn't work until I manually compiled and installed the lastest open-iscsi > > sources. > > > I have a dual dual-core Opteron box. > > > where /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0049003c... would represent /dev/sdc for the > > domU > > > > > root space and /dev/disk/by-id/scsi-0049005a... would represent /dev/sdd > > > for > > > the domU swap space and are individual disks as seen by the dom0. I'm > > > using > > > the /dev/disk/by-id names for each disk as these are unique names as seen > > > by > > > all iSCSI initiators and allow me to migrate live domUs between physical > > > dom0s. > > > > To perform live migration, do you have a separate iscsi target server or > > can one use one of the dom0's? I want to test live migration with 2 dom0's, > > one has a large disk attached to it which I want to use for the iSCSI > > target. But if I try to connect to the iSCSI shares on both dom0's at the > > same time... the dom0 with the large disk hangs. > > > I am using a separate target server - as in a large ~6T storage server using > IET to provide a pile of LUNs. I have seen some comments on the open-iscsi > list about problems with accessing targets on the same machine in certain > circumstances, I'm afraid I can't remember the details as they didn't apply > in my situation. > > > Am I doing something wrong here? My impression is/was that both xen's mount > > the same iscsi drive at the same time when transferring (hence the need for > > GFS/OCFS2 I've read about in this list), or does one dom0 safely unmount > > and the other one mounts? > > > I don't know about this. I'm only using reiserfs on the connected LUNs and > haven't hit any problems yet. > > Matthew _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |