[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question
- To: "Julius Spencer" <julius@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: "Greg Cockburn" <gergnz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 12:36:55 +1000
- Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Tue, 16 May 2006 19:38:22 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=NafLjlr2JmrJ8eXECCjUUc+tj+zHppHF/zoakOmg508e+0hJberE47XOZffsOTizCUyB8I6l93bNGSkPFA1nGgigpfmVdEGWmfThWVV3jYQhdrwJ3JcLYnomINhx18t1Fw+k148R9HpTV9f1Hp3pSMhdqP2ZYyjpgeWZ7Vg6x+w=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
That sounds like my IBM ServeRaid 7. I don't know much about the 8, do you know what the adaptec equivalent is? I think mine is the 2410SA, and that uses the aacraid module.
On 5/17/06,
Julius Spencer <julius@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yeah, unfortunately no. I think it is one of the few that isn't, from Adaptec (my luck!). It's module name is: adpahci ; I haven't found this anywhere except as Suse and RHEL rpms.
If you have heard of it though, do let me know. It's the Adaptec
HostRAID (IBM ServeRAID-8e) embedded in the motherboard.
From what I've read it's fakeraid, but at least it must deliver some resources which would have been nice... Plus there's a sweet IBM application which lets you manage and monitor the RAID (if it can find
the controller via the OS).
Greg Cockburn wrote: > Are you sure the adaptec driver is not in the kernel. I have adaptec to > be very good, in terms of opening up their drives. I have not come
> across one that wasn't already in the kernel. > > I have used SCSI and SATA Controllers and RAID variants of each without > getting any drivers from adaptec. > > Greg. > > On 5/17/06, *Petersson, Mats* <
Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx > <mailto:Mats.Petersson@xxxxxxx>> wrote: > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Julius Spencer [mailto:julius@xxxxxxxxx > <mailto:julius@xxxxxxxxx>] > > Sent: 16 May 2006 21:23
> > To: Petersson, Mats > > Cc: Sylvain Coutant; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the reply! > > > > Essentially I have a binary driver. There are only a few
> > OS's which it works under. Unfortunately IBM say that they > > don't have much 'swing' in getting their suppliers to open > > source the driver and Adaptec seem to have made it impossible
> > to make contact with them unless you have bought > > from them directly. > > > > If I could patch the kernel which comes with the distro so it > > was "xenified" ( :) ) then perhaps I could continue to use
> > the same driver. > > > > In this case, as it is a RAID type of device I'll have to opt > > to use software RAID. > > > > Thank you again for the reply.
> > Unfortunately in this type of situation, I'm not sure you'd get much > help by using an older kernel - the driver may well not behave itself > well enough to still work under Xen... At least, I think that is still a
> problem in Xenified Linux as it is under HVM - drivers in Xenified > Linux > are modified to "understand" Xen, and that's not going to work with > binary drivers. However, I may be wrong. Someone with better
> understanding of this may be able to correct me (or say I'm right). > > -- > Mats > > > > Petersson, Mats wrote: > > > > > >
> > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Sylvain Coutant [mailto:sco@xxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:sco@xxxxxxxxxx
>] > > >> Sent: 16 May 2006 12:02 > > >> To: Petersson, Mats; 'Julius Spencer'; > > xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >> Subject: RE: [Xen-users] Basic Xen Question > > >> > > >>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to patch an older kernel (eg.
> > >>>> 2.6.9) so it can be compiled to run as a Xen kernel (dom0)? > > >>> Now, my question is: Why would you want that? > > >> ie, just because one have some other patches to apply against the
> > >> kernel. It can sometimes be a true nightmare to set up a full > > >> dom0+domU which includes every tool one need :-( > > > > > > Ok, fair enough. You'd just have to look at which patches are the
> > > biggest - and I think Xen is quite intrusive, so unless your other > > > patches are also touching a lot of files in the kernel, I would > > > suspect that porting the other patches would be easier...
> > > > > > -- > > > Mats > > >> -- > > >> Sylvain > > >> > > >> > > >>
> > >> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Xen-users mailing list > > >
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list >
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-users mailing list >
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|