Re: [Xen-users] Re: question about xen regression test tools

[James Bulpin <james@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Shi, Alex wrote:
> I found the "updpingpong" case was not run recently. Does it have some 
> problem?

It's not been written yet.

Please keep list discussions on the list.

James

> 
> Thanks and best regards
> Alex shi
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of James Bulpin
> Sent: 2006年3月22日 11:21
> To: Shi, Alex
> Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-users] Re: question about xen regression test tools
> 
> Alex,
> 
> ttcpbw uses a variant of the ttcp+ tool (see
> http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/netx/code/ttcp.c)
> 
> specjbb is SPEC JBB (www.spec.org)
> 
> postmark 1.5c is what we use
> 
> vm86 is an internal test
> 
> We use memtest 0.0.4 but I've disabled it for now as I don't trust it.
> 
> James
> 
> Shi, Alex wrote:
> 
>> 
>>
>>
>>I am very interesting to the xen regression test tools. like memtest, dbench, 
>>osdb, etc. etc.
>>But I can not find some tools via google. like vm86, ttcpbw, specjbb, and 
>>postmark  (just find a postmark-1_5.c file from 
>>http://linuxcompressed.sourceforge.net/statistics/)
>>and the memtest test suite is very old. it is just 0.0.4 version. 
>>So, Anyone like to tell me where I can find them? and share more detailed 
>>info of the test result on xenU or VMX domain of these test suites?
>>
>>Any hints will be very appreciated!
>>
>>
>>Thanks and best regards
>>Alex shi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users