[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU

To: "Markus Hochholdinger" <Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: "Nicholas Lee" <emptysands@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:09:24 +1300
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 10:22:27 +0000
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NG23I/kIC9nsJgNNoUTZpMFLydX9PMn4cNUTYqi74ZUdftWSTSpbQRFpFnxPz2GL88ChOmCZknuzesvNR0N1VL1F//4WlYkuI2fgW8RCDK91VAdN0MP64g/K0llugaMtX6Wj/soarTnBOYP/iZPX1zWJ5Kuz2WkFlm1d8WQxAKU=
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

On 19/02/06, Markus Hochholdinger <Markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> well, perhaps because all the network traffic has to go from domU (nfs-server)
> over dom0 (network bridge or routing) to domU (nfs-client).

No, because when a domU NFS server provides NFS to another physical
machine, usually there are no problems.  Its maybe not quite as fast
as normal, but very workable.

--
Nicholas Lee
http://stateless.geek.nz
gpg 8072 4F86 EDCD 4FC1 18EF  5BDD 07B0 9597 6D58 D70C

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

References:
- [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU
  - From: Richard Jones
- Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU
  - From: Markus Hochholdinger

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-users] internal-br vs xenbr0. networking issue
Next by Date: [Xen-users] Xen Newbie queries
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-users] Xen, NFS performance, rsize, wsize and MTU
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.