[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] xen 3.0.0 & 3.0.1 compatibility?


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Andy Repton <xen@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:06:35 +0000
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 12 Feb 2006 19:18:31 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=kVK5qrjWffZH8aVhOS6VcX1MT8Xe7hChOcILkNeeICWTAEXidwREHvn1EAVCcS+gdD+ivx0yyEwkmpzBDw1FMRe72WLMbAzjTPls5USREt6Sq43lUQguhka0aZZC1e9FqZj0nIH1ps9nc8FDG3z+xCJk56nwYIQfrZQuZ8uR3oI=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

The 2.6.12 kernel has security problems so I'm using the mercurial
linux tree and xen-unstable. Works fine on gentoo; I'll wait for
portage to catch up, but it does seem that xen is not high priority on
gentoo compared with, say, suse, who are tracking unstable too.

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.