[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-users] 64bit processors and TLS warning message


  • To: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:03:35 +0100
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:13:23 +0000
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=twWkOQLEzy0lgd1v35ngfYHUOnGg7DCCooXF8lzjVtyeEoa1//llIL5OooasryEZPMbxTQpBZ2kZkdNJrGsHevjmZhctoINKClX4Klu6ag6vyhiLwIa6UvUqdmHP+Bvhy2nkHd4JodPFZ3BIUW9DCzFPYSRri2jirKT0K2TEK/M=
  • List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>

Mark Williamson wrote:
> PAINCHAUD Christophe:
> > I am running an AMD64 Debian system and I noticed that the warning
> > message about /lib/tls like on my other 32bit systems does not appear on
> > this one. Does that mean that AM64 Linux archs aren't TLS enabled ?
>
> It's just not an issue like it is on 32-bit - the TLS implementation doesn't
> conflict with the way Xen enforces protection.

If by "different implementation" you mean that "different TLS
implementations in Xen are used for different hardware architecures",
that makes me wonder:

If I do *not* use -mno-tls-direct-seg-refs or gcc patches on my x86-64
system, will I actually enjoy a performance benefit from the GCC
compiler's TLS optimizations, at least for 32bit userland apps?

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.